The information leak in the online collaboration sink
Learn why information leaks in online collaboration applications are important to you
Earlier, I promised that I would look into online collaboration tools. I started looking into Zoho, Google Docs & Spreadsheets, Thinkfree and others. I was a bit worried that these services created an opening for security violations.
What I found was downright scary. People use online collaboration tools to document the most damaging private and commercial information and leave this information in a public folder or URL for the entire world to see.
The tech industry speaks as though the security and privacy problems inherent in collaboration and Web 2.0 software were merely a theoretical problem. My intention here is to show that this problem is very real. I will also suggest a solution.
Here are some of the things I found (note: I blacked out personal data):
Samples of personal medical information leaks
I’m pretty sure that recipient of the following letter is not aware that the details of his orthopedic appointment have been published on the Internet.
The following image was taken from a 13-page list of daily admissions to an ICU. It probably was posted by a nurse or doctor who wanted to share information about a patient with a colleague. The unfortunate side effect was the exposure of enormous amounts of private medical data to anyone with a browser.
Samples of personal employment information leaks
This Best Buy employee decided to go to school and resign from Best Buy. That’s not such a big deal, but if I was a master spear phisher, I could use the information to my advantage.
The same goes for this XILINX employee. These are just two examples of countless personal and corporate documents that contain data that can be used for spear phishing. Perhaps we should call it spear phishing 2.0: fraud based on information found in Web 2.0 apps.
Samples of personal and corporate financial information leaks
The following claims form was filled in with every kind of personal financial information about Mr. S. Using this to perform identity theft is a piece of cake.
Ironically, this next example was taken from a status letter sent by a VC that invests in Web 2.0 and online collaboration to its limited partners. It was a very interesting read, with much financial data.
The mother of all leaks – Passwords galore
For all you techies who are thinking, “Heh heh, stupid users, putting all their private data on the Web,” here are some techie-generated documents. I actually logged into the accounts shown in the next documents.
How big is the problem of information leaks?
After we checked some 1,500 documents that had been created by online collaboration tools and published on the internet (without any access restrictions), two facts emerged:
- The probability that users will leak confidential information is inversely proportional to the ease with which users can share information in any given tool.
- Between 0.5 percent and 5 percent of all information published by online collaboration tools is confidential and, if it falls into the wrong hands, potentially harmful. (One of the services that I checked had about 25 “leaking” documents out of just over 500 public documents checked.)
Why information leaking could spell the end of online-collaboration tools
Corporations are terrified of information leaks. Information leaks such as the ones we’ve discussed make the company a target for litigation, pave the way to commercial espionage, and may help expose weaknesses in the company or its management.
Once this problem becomes known, corporations will act swiftly and decisively and block their users from accessing online-collaboration tools. Since corporations are the target market for online-collaboration vendors, getting blocked by corporations is very bad news.
How can information leaking be prevented?
The problem can be solved by not allowing users to publish “open to all” documents. Just don’t allow users to publish documents on the Internet on a publicly accessible URL. This is a painful act, since it decreases the productivity gain offered by online-collaboration tools, but it is necessary for those tools that wish to survive.
One more thing
All the tools I checked were amazing–easy to use, fast and skillfully designed. In fact, the high quality of these tools attracted all these users and led to the information leaks.
Related posts:
- Zoho removes demo account from home page
- Online office and collaboration news
- What is spreadsheet collaboration?
- Collaboration scenario: planning the budget
- Collaboration scenario: updating the contacts list
Posted on December 11, 2006 by Yoav Ezer
Filed Under Collaboration, Google, Office 2.0
Comments
51 Responses to “The information leak in the online collaboration sink”
Leave a Reply


Yoav,
Thank you for an excellent post. We at Zoho take this issue seriously – indeed, the default setting for any document at Zoho is private, and users have to explicitly make a document public in order for it to be public.
The solution you suggest (not allow anyone to make their document public) is too draconian though. As an example, we ourselves have published help documentation (see http://writer.zoho.com/public/zohoprojects/Table-Of-Contents/noband ) that is authored in Zoho Writer, and published to the world. Prohibiting such perfectly valid use cases could be a huge productivity loss.
To an extent, this kind of difficulty is present in any website that allows users to upload content. It is all too easy to cut and paste an email and post it as a comment in a blog, for example. And it is easy to upload an internal or private video in a video sharing site (as it happened to Bank of America recently).
A couple of approaches we could consider: a) give an explicit warning to users that making a documement public means it could be indexed by search engines and could live on forever in public archives, and asking them to confirm if they really want to make it public and b) give a public, but unguessable URL to the user, and require a second confirmation to actually show the URL in any kind of index. With the second option, a document is public, but it won’t be shown in any kind of public listing, and the URL would have to be manually copied and circulated by the user. A second confirmation would be needed to publish it to a listing so that search engines can find this URL.
Sridhar
Hi Sridhar,
After browsing about 1500 created in online collaboration tools, I have to disagree about the extent of the productivity loss. Maybe 98% of all documents were either created for personal use or for sharing with a specific group of people.
Of the 2% which were meant for public use some were blatantly illegal (such as a username and password for a paid online book which a teacher wanted his students to read), While others were harmless.
But the more significant issue (IMO) is the damage that can be caused to your company and the company of the user. Some of the documents that I mentioned can be used as a basis for a multi-million dollar lawsuit.
If you feel that you must keep the online publishing feature, then I suggest that you notify the user (in big bold letters), that he may be publishing private/commercial information that can cause damage to him or the company he works for, and that you (Zoho) are not responsible in anyway for whatever harm the publishing of this content may cause him or others.
Using the unguessable URL and maybe using robots.txt are good precautions, but informing the user of the dangers in online publishing is crucial.
-Yoav
P.S.
I loved your product
[...] Earlier this week I talked about zoho not being vulnerable to the annoying microsoft bug that had no patch. Saasafras, see how easy it is to make an attribution Saasafras? It didn’t hurt or anything, made a post saying I’d said zoho was safer than offline alternatives and used my post as evidence. Saasafras then went on to talk about something completely unrelated to my point, that zoho wasn’t vulnerable to the microsoft zero day problem, and discuss a post about files shared over the internet as being insecure. Well, DUH. A HUGELY important quote from the mentioned article: People use online collaboration tools to document the most damaging private and commercial information and leave this information in a public folder or URL for the entire world to see. [...]
Really good information!
Could you please let me know how did you mine so much info?
Hi Vimal,
Thanks for the compliment.
Just go to google and use the search operator site:subdomain.nameofcompany.com
for instance, try searching for…
site:docs.google.com
and click on the “repeat the search with the omitted results included.” link.
[...] There’s some buzz in the blogosphere about the insecurity of some online collaboration tools that seems to center around some research done by Yoav on his blog. He discovered, with relative ease, that a lot of people are using the PUBLISH option of several popular online collaborative tools (like zoho and/or google spreadsheets) instead of sharing them with specific people. He’s unearthing medical records, and personal data that the USER put out there on the net through their own ignorance. We (Yoav and I) both agree the user did something wrong here. I think an attorney and judges would agree as well if they got their collective behinds sued for being careless with medical records in at least one case. [...]
[...] In a previous post, I mentioned an inherent security problem with online collaboration tools. The quickest to respond was Zoho. First, Zoho commented on the post. It then removed the demo account from their home page (a no-login account which allowed users to test their product). [...]
A little conversation at this end of the blogosphere
There has been lots of examples of companies ignoring users getting punished in the long run. And with the proliferation of blogs, the reaction’s much more immediate.
Thanks to gurus and blogging evangelists like Robert Scoble, Steve Rubel, Seth …
[...] Zoho, my online document tool of choice for both .doc files and spreadsheet files is also in the habit of listening to their customers, and we don’t even pay them anything. A while back there was a bit of a dust-up over the security and privacy of online document tools. Zoho representatives were in all the threads about it that I saw reading and responding, and, more importantly, addressing the concerns of those involved. It wasn’t just a PR thing where they posted a little “Thanks for the heads up; we’re looking into it, keep buying Product X!” thing by an advertising guy. It actually affected change that was implemented in the product. Zoho listened to their customers. [...]
Good work!
Thank You
Hi Alex,
My Pleasure
Cool…
MSN I NIIPET
MSN
interesting
shipping online ambien online samples ambien
Cool…
Nice
Cool!
Sorry
Nice…
jersey medium psychic medium north psychic
great work man thx
Projjex.com is a great new site that does a fabulous job of collaboration. It’s completely browser-based, really easy to use, and has a free version. Cool videos too – I love it!
comment2, addiction pornography symptom, 92393,
comment3, bareback bush fetches gay porn, =-]],
comment2, gagagogo porn, slnxnt,
comment5,
comment4,
My site is great, diablo ii patch 1.11, 088100,
Sorry for my post, clinton county pa sheriff patch,
,
Hello, thx for all, crazy nine patch quilt, oqt,
Privet,
Hi, good site, http://www.kaboodle.com/tube8 tube8 teen fuck movie, kjic,
cheap student airfares
Sorry for my post,
Soft,
Hi, good site, cheap last minute airfares, 866,
http://www.kaboodle.com/micronion
http://www.kaboodle.com/kerolisa
gay pornhub
pornhub download
Sorry for my post, freedom tube, 8OO,
Privet, tube8 teen porn movie, 903231,
Hi, visit my link please, tube8 teen porn movie, 680620,
Hi, good site, youporn cocks, 269,
And who does not wish to pay for a hosting, is urgent here – the best free web hosting!
comment6
comment5
comment6
comment5