Is a Microsoft Buy Out Yahoo’s Best Chance for Survival?
There are two sad facts in search today:
- Yahoo! has been a great company and done some wonderful things
- The “mostly not evil” Google is only increasing their domination of the market, growing to a monopoly
Yahoo! can’t beat Google. Microsoft can’t beat Google. Perhaps, combined they could give them some competition?


Yes, I know this is not an original idea, and there have always been rumors of talks, but looking over past history I think it is time someone on either side really put some thought into it.
Microsoft hasn’t had a great time, what with Vista and Office releases failing to set the world alight and Google eating into their mind share. Yahoo! … well, what good news have they had?
In fact, I am not sure Yahoo!, a company I still root for, couldn’t have created worse PR if they had tried.
- Sacked CEO Terry Semel (good thing in some respects, but not stock market crowd-pleasing PR)
- Brought back Jerry Yang (brilliant bloke but no Google-beater)
- Handing over information to China to help create political prisoners and lying to the US government about it
- Getting sued by families of said political prisoners
Yahoo! owns some great properties, such as Flickr, plus can still claim brilliant staff, such as the Zonetag team. Between them they have potential to give them a platform within reach of owning half of search (combined they would start with roughly 40% of search traffic). Microsoft is more and more looking to web delivery of software and services so the old arguments of “desktop software versus web services” is becoming less of an issue.
What do you think?
Related posts:
- Where is the Excel community?
- We’ve struck gold
- Cogniview is now a certified partner of Microsoft
- Microsoft and Engagement Mapping
- Microsoft Office 2007 launches
Posted on December 20, 2007 by Chris Garrett
Filed Under Microsoft
Comments
6 Responses to “Is a Microsoft Buy Out Yahoo’s Best Chance for Survival?”
Leave a Reply
Yahoo! should not focus on search. Instead, they should focus on being an entertainment portal with strong social tools.
Yahoo still holds the #1 ranked site in terms of traffic (according to Alexa). I am a big fan of Yahoo, but like a lot of the recent Google acquisitions. MicroHoo, doesn’t have a nice ring to it…
It like playing Monopoly, once you get all of the condos and houses built up, you’re unstoppable. Google is just about to that point. The only thing that may bring them down is trying to do too much without keeping up the level of standards in their offerings.
I think that’s a great idea. A convicted predatory monopolist joining forces with a company that willingly cooperates with one of the most oppressive nations on planet earth, and then lies about it.
What could possibly go wrong there?
@Uwe - Without search will they lose audience though?
@Tony - Yes you could say they are over-stretching. While they have some brilliant “bits”, Google Earth especially, Picasa, quality and success varies a great deal. But you can say that for Y! and MS too
@Tony, Google can never become a monopoly. Monopolies have “the exclusive possession or control of the supply or trade in a commodity or service.” The only way Google could have “exclusive control” is by government fiat, outlawing alternative search engines.
Google does dominate the search engine field and they’re making huge profits because of it. Those same profits are attracting competitors that will one day unseat Google.
[...] 20th 2007 5:40am [-] From: cogniview.com [...]